Teams evaluating AuditBoard often tell us CrossComply can feel rigid enough that even a new field becomes a developer request.
7 out of 10 GRC replacement buyers choose ZenGRC
AuditBoard was built for SOX.Your compliance program was not.
AuditBoard's GRC module extends an internal audit platform. ZenGRC is built from the ground up for compliance teams managing multiple frameworks. No rigid lanes. No developer dependency. A more unified operating model for compliance.
- One platform with more connected workflows.
- Self-service fields, workflows, and reports. No developer queue.
- Built for compliance teams, not retrofit SOX workflows.
SOC 2
ISO 27001
HIPAA
NIST
HITRUST
PCI DSS
CMMC
By submitting this form, you agree to the privacy policy and, where required, the data processing agreement.
Your data stays in its own isolated environment. Single-tenant architecture.
Trusted by compliance teams replacing rigid, audit-first tools
Some compliance leaders tell us they do not want to earn a certification just to run their GRC program.
Why ZenGRC
Why teams choose ZenGRC over AuditBoard
01
One platform. Fewer disconnected workflows.
AuditBoard sells a suite, but evidence and workflows still stay in separate lanes. SOX teams collect one set of proof, compliance teams collect another, and the duplication never really goes away. ZenGRC runs on one connected data model, so risks, controls, evidence, issues, and frameworks all stay linked.
Teams evaluating AuditBoard often tell us the workflows can feel rigid enough that every process has to fit the platform's lanes.
Compliance operations leadEnterprise software company
02
Self-administrable. No developer required.
AuditBoard often relies on backend help for field changes, workflow updates, and structural changes across a complex permission model. ZenGRC is built so compliance teams can configure fields, workflows, dashboards, and reports themselves without tickets or code.
Compliance teams should not need an academy course or a developer sprint just to run GRC.
Governance managerHealthcare organization
03
Built for compliance. Not retrofitted from internal audit.
AuditBoard's roots are SOX and internal audit. Teams evaluating CrossComply often ask for stronger cross-framework mapping, connected issue workflows, and more flexible reporting. ZenGRC was built for multi-framework compliance from day one, so issues, findings, vendors, controls, and risks can all connect in one place.
The same friction points come up repeatedly: too many clicks, no clean bulk Jira creation, and limited ways to segment reporting by subsidiary.
Security and compliance leadMulti-entity enterprise
Competitive edge
Where ZenGRC pulls away from AuditBoard
One connected data model
Everything shares data across risks, controls, evidence, issues, and frameworks. No module silos.
Self-service customization
Fields, workflows, dashboards, and reports stay in your team's hands instead of a developer backlog.
Jira sync that works both ways
Create remediation tickets in bulk and keep engineering updates synced back automatically.
Flat pricing, faster go-live
Unlimited users, every framework included, and a dedicated Solutions Consultant partnered with your CSM to help your team realize value quickly.
What teams say after they switch
Teams that try to extend a SOX-first platform into broader compliance often end up recreating work across separate workflows.
Compliance leader
Mid-market insurance company
Teams evaluating AuditBoard often ask for flatter pricing and connectors that work without extra setup.
Security and compliance leader
Autonomous technology company
For organizations with more complex structures, customization and reporting can start to feel like a developer project.
Risk and compliance team
Large research institution
The same themes keep coming up in replacements: siloed workflows, rigid configuration, and too much admin overhead for everyday compliance work.
Governance program owner
Enterprise compliance team
Wall of Love
Don't just take our word for it
Head-to-head
ZenGRC vs AuditBoard
| AuditBoard | ZenGRC | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Internal audit and SOX teams. CrossComply extends the platform for broader GRC workflows. |
Compliance teams running multi-framework programs on one connected platform. |
| Data sharing | Workflows can stay separated across modules, which can create duplicate collection and handoffs. |
One data model. Risks, controls, evidence, vendors, and issues all connect. |
| Customization | Backend help and a complex permission model can slow even simple changes. |
Self-service fields, workflows, reports, and dashboards. |
| Jira integration | More limited Jira workflows and no clean bulk ticket creation. |
True bidirectional sync with bulk ticket creation and automatic status updates. |
| Training required | Meaningful adoption often benefits from AuditBoard Academy and admin training. |
Teams can use it on day one without certification. |
| Pricing | Aggressive at entry, then expands with seats, vendors, modules, and services. |
Flat pricing with unlimited users and every framework included. |
| Implementation | Rollout can take longer when workflows, permissions, and services need coordination. |
A Solutions Consultant and CSM working in tandem to help your team get to value, faster. |
FAQs
Questions we hear from teams evaluating AuditBoard
We already have AuditBoard for SOX. Why not just add CrossComply? +
SOX and compliance are different workflows with different teams. CrossComply was added to AuditBoard after the fact, and the modules do not fully share data. Evidence collected for SOX does not always flow cleanly to your compliance team, so duplicate work can pile up. Teams evaluating alternatives often want one purpose-built platform for the full compliance program.
Is AuditBoard cheaper? +
AuditBoard can look aggressive on initial GRC pricing, but the cost grows with vendor counts, user seats, and services for backend changes. ZenGRC keeps it simple: one flat price, every framework included, unlimited users, and fewer surprises at renewal.
How is the Jira integration different? +
ZenGRC has true bidirectional Jira sync. Your compliance team can create remediation tasks in bulk, and everything engineering does in Jira syncs back automatically. AuditBoard's Jira workflows are more limited, and teams regularly flag the lack of clean bulk ticket creation as a blocker.
Can we really configure ZenGRC without developers? +
Yes. Fields, workflows, dashboards, and reports are configurable by your compliance team in the front-end UI. No backend tickets, no developer queue, and no certification course just to make the platform fit your program.
How long does it take to switch from AuditBoard? +
Replacement timelines vary based on your current setup, frameworks, and integrations. ZenGRC gives you a dedicated CSM to guide the rollout, prioritize what matters first, and help your team move quickly without unnecessary services overhead.
What happens when we add another framework or business unit? +
ZenGRC keeps the same connected objects in place, so you can map a new framework against existing controls, segment reporting by subsidiary or product, and reuse evidence instead of starting another siloed project.
See what your compliance program looks like without the rigid lanes
30 minutes. Your frameworks mapped. Your integrations connected. No modules. No silos. Just one platform that works the way your team does.