Teams evaluating Hyperproof often tell us it handles the audit, but they need something more holistic between audits.
7 out of 10 GRC replacement buyers choose ZenGRC
Hyperproof gets you the audit report.ZenGRC runs your compliance program.
Evidence collection is just one part of compliance. Risk management, cross-framework mapping, entity-level scoping, Jira integration that actually works, and reporting you can slice any way you need. That is what a real GRC platform does. That is ZenGRC.
- Manage the program, not just the audit.
- Bulk Jira sync, flexible reporting, and connected risk workflows.
- Entity, product, and framework scoping with direct platform ownership.
SOC 2
ISO 27001
HIPAA
NIST
HITRUST
PCI DSS
CMMC
By submitting this form, you agree to the privacy policy and, where required, the data processing agreement.
Your data stays in its own isolated environment. Single-tenant architecture.
Trusted by teams that outgrew evidence-collection tools
Some buyers describe Hyperproof as heavy on evidence collection but lighter on broader program management.
Why ZenGRC
Why teams switch from Hyperproof to ZenGRC
01
Manage your program, not just your audits.
Hyperproof is built for collecting evidence and producing audit reports. Between audits, governance, risk tracking, continuous monitoring, and multi-framework program management all start to feel thin. ZenGRC manages the whole GRC lifecycle, not just the audit at the end of it.
Teams evaluating Hyperproof often tell us they need a more holistic approach once the audit is over.
Program managerMulti-framework enterprise team
02
A Jira integration that actually works.
If your compliance team assigns remediation work to engineering, Jira is the bridge. Teams comparing Hyperproof often want stronger Jira workflows, bulk task creation, and less manual sync work. ZenGRC has true bidirectional Jira sync, bulk task creation, and automatic updates back into the compliance program.
Teams ask for cleaner Jira workflows, bulk ticket creation, and reporting that can segment by subsidiary.
Engineering-facing compliance leadMid-market technology company
03
Risk management that is not an afterthought.
As programs mature, teams often want more connected risk scoring, findings, and reporting that flows into board conversations. ZenGRC ties risks to controls, controls to evidence, and evidence to frameworks so the program updates together when risk changes.
Teams evaluating alternatives often ask for risk tracking that stays connected to the rest of the compliance program.
Risk and controls ownerGrowing compliance organization
Competitive edge
Where ZenGRC goes further than Hyperproof
Reporting you control
Slice by entity, product, framework, subsidiary, or any custom dimension without exporting everything to Excel.
Direct ownership with your team
One platform, one predictable price, and a Solutions Consultant partnered with your CSM, so ZenGRC owns the relationship and accelerates value with your team.
Granular evidence collection
117 integrations with control over accounts, scope, and frequency instead of pulling everything by default.
Ownership that survives turnover
Work stays structured when teammates leave, so your program does not reset with every handoff.
What teams say after they switch
Teams with entity-specific scoping, bulk Jira ticket creation, and flexible reporting needs often look for a broader program platform.
Security and compliance leader
Mid-market retail platform
Some teams get frustrated when every customization starts to feel like a services project instead of normal admin work.
Compliance operations leader
Regional retail organization
As teams mature, ownership transfer and long-term program structure become just as important as audit workflows.
Risk and controls team
Mid-market software company
A recurring theme in evaluations is that evidence collection alone is not enough for a modern compliance program.
Security and compliance leader
1,000+ employee organization
Wall of Love
Don't just take our word for it
Head-to-head
ZenGRC vs Hyperproof
| Hyperproof | ZenGRC | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for | Tactical audit management and evidence collection. |
Full GRC program management between audits and across frameworks. |
| Risk management | Separate risk tracking can emerge when teams need deeper scoring, connected findings, and board-level reporting. |
Connected risk register tied to controls, evidence, findings, and board reporting. |
| Jira integration | More manual ticket workflows and less flexible sync for engineering handoffs. |
True bidirectional sync with bulk ticket creation and automatic updates. |
| Entity and product scoping | Cannot cleanly scope views by entity, product, or subsidiary. |
Segment posture and audits by owner, framework, product, or business unit. |
| Reporting | Rigid out-of-box reports push teams back to spreadsheets. |
Flexible dashboards and custom views for every stakeholder. |
| Evidence collection | Good integrations, but less granular control over scope and frequency. |
117 integrations with granular collection by account, source, and cadence. |
| Pricing and ownership | Services models and handoffs can add cost and operational friction over time. |
Flat pricing, a dedicated Solutions Consultant and CSM working together, and clean ownership continuity as your team evolves. |
FAQs
Questions we hear from teams evaluating Hyperproof
Hyperproof has good evidence collection. Why switch? +
Evidence collection is only one part of compliance. Between audits, teams manage risks, track remediation, assign work to engineering, report to leadership, and prepare for the next framework. Hyperproof handles the evidence. ZenGRC handles the full program.
We are using Hyperproof through an MSP. Is switching complicated? +
Switching complexity depends on your current setup, frameworks, and processes. ZenGRC provides a dedicated CSM to help plan the rollout, prioritize the highest-value migration work first, and help your team take direct ownership.
Is ZenGRC's evidence collection as good as Hyperproof's? +
ZenGRC has 117 integrations, but the bigger difference is granularity. You control what gets collected, from which accounts, and how often. If you need subset-level pulls across multiple environments, ZenGRC gives you that control instead of collecting everything by default.
What about risk management? +
ZenGRC ties risks to controls, controls to evidence, and evidence to frameworks. You can create custom scoring, connect findings back to audit activities, and build reporting leadership can actually use. Teams evaluating alternatives often ask for risk tracking that stays connected to the broader program.
How fast can we replace Hyperproof? +
Replacement timelines depend on your current setup, frameworks, integrations, and governance model. ZenGRC provides a dedicated CSM to guide the rollout and help your team move quickly without layering in extra operational complexity.
Can ZenGRC handle entity or product-level reporting? +
Yes. ZenGRC lets you segment by entity, product, subsidiary, owner, or framework so leadership sees exactly the slice they care about instead of one rigid global view.
See what a real GRC platform looks like
30 minutes. Your frameworks. Your integrations. Your risks connected to your controls. Not just another evidence collection tool.